Nerdities

Home Theater vs. Movie Theater

Posted by Paulie at 11:56 AM on July 6, 2004.

A quote from Slashdot user stienman, "Movie theaters exist because home theaters are very expensive and it's more cost effective to see the movie in the theater than to invest in a good home setup."

Is it? Let's find out.

I see, on average, two movies a week. Sure, they may not both be in the theater, but let's assume it's all or nothing. I have to choose between movies in my home or movies in the theater.

2 movies at $12 a movie is $24 a week. Because it's an average, we can run it over the whole year of 52 weeks. That's $1248 dollars per year in watching movies - pretty good entertainment value, actually.

Now let's say that I want to watch all the movies in my home, instead of in the theater. Let's also factor in that home theater equipment will age and need replacing. My guess is that new technology makes replacing a home theater setup every 5 years a priority for anyone who really enjoys movies at home.

5 years at $1248 a year - that's $6240 every five years. With today's credit cards and no payments for 90 days, etc etc, let's assume you don't have to drop 6 grand all at once. Let's also look at where I live - with 14% sales tax. We'll drop that off the end total, leaving me with $5475 (approximately) before taxes to spend on a home theater setup.

So what do you need for a good home theater setup? No, I'm not an audiophile, I'm just a guy with a room in the basement I like to call "The Media Room", and I want to feel the bass of explosions, and have a bit of surround action with a good picture.

Well, I don't think LCDs and Plasmas are quite cheap enough for the average home theater owner - maybe in the next 5 years.

For now, given that there's enough room in the basement, I think a rear-projection TV should be fine.

It looks like, at current pricing, I can get between a 46 and 53" rear projection TV for the $2000 mark. That's checking online at FutureShop, so your mileage may vary.

Even a progressive-scan DVD player is no more than $150 nowadays, so let's add one of those.

That leaves $3325 for audio. Holy moly. Maybe I'll get a bigger TV.

A home-theater-in-a-box setup starts around $500. But you don't want that, do you? you want explosions and lasers and things flying from behind you!

Oooh, the Bose LS-18 Lifestyle System is $2799.99 - that should be snazzy.. tiny little speakers, and has DVD in it already - the receiver does Dolby and DTS, but not THX.. oh well..

It's a matter of choice if you like the all-in-one receiver/dvd player setup, or you like a big, industrial-sized receiver, with giant front speakers and smaller rear speakers. But I know for a fact you can get it all for 3 grand. Even the nice Sony Setup is a hair under $2000.

So why switch to home theater and give up the movie theater? What are the advantages and disadvantages to both?

Well, let's start with Home Theater disadvantages:
1) Date thinks you're cheap for not taking her out.
2) Nothing beats theater popcorn.
3) You have to wait for the movie to come out on DVD.
4) No matter how big your TV is, it's not 3 stories tall.

Home Theater Advantages:
1) Comfortable seating (I'm fat, this is important).
2) Movie pauses while you pee.
3) You can bring in any food and drink you like, even pizza.
4) Extended DVD versions of most movies.
5) Nobody except your girlfriend talks through the whole movie.

It's a bit of a toss-up, and it really matters on how much space you have and how you like to spend your time. If you watch a lot of TV or play a lot of video games, the home setup will have some more advantages for you. If you like to go out on the town, or hate being in your house, then you'll likely want to go to the movies.

And what about all the talk at work about how cool the latest Spider-man movie was? Wait for it on DVD, and you've missed the buzz.

What do you think? Which would you choose?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.fatpaulie.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Home Theater vs. Movie Theater:

» natural penis enlargement from natural penis enlargement
[Read More]

» Tuesday ski and board report from lake rental ski tahoe
It’sa Happy New Year in North Lake Tahoe with ski resorts reporting in with tons of new snow — and [Read More]

» REPORT BLAMES ALL CORNERS OF from attorney bay tampa
China PostREPORT BLAMES ALL CORNERS OF BASEBALLTampa Tribune,FL-Dec 13, 2007Although no current Tampa Bay Rays players were implicated, 11 former [Read More]

Comments: (6)

Just a comment to see if my changes to the comment system are working.

Rory:

The one thing you missed in your analysis is the cost of renting movies. True, you can get a great home theatre system for the price of 5 years of movies, but you need to remember that rentals now are close to 6 bucks (which is half the price of a movie - but you can split it with friends you watch the movie with at home).

That being said, I think I have a pretty good home theatre, which I use on occasion, but I enjoy going to movies when they come out. A movie theatre provides, as you said, an opportunity to see new material that your friends are, or will be talking about, and provides a nice opportunity to get out of the house.

In summary, I refuse to pick one or the other, I enjoy both :P

otis:

Paulie, you forgot to add the cost of chairs (hey, the theatre's got 'em!). Although, since only you and your friends will be in there, I recommend leather recliners.

You'll also need some cool lighting, preferably operated by remote control.

~otis

Blake:

No offense paulie, but you clearly know NOTHING about home theater systems. Damn. You chose a Bose theater system? Firstly, Bose is absolute SHIT. Yeah I don't care if the guy at Circuit City told you otherwise, he's wrong. Those "tiny" speakers are terrible. A general rule with screens, and with speakers is - the bigger the better. You simply can NOT obtain a true surround experience with a Bose system. There are no redeeming qualities to Bose speakers, period.

Did you know they are the ONLY speaker manufacturer to not publish the specs of their speakers? Why? Because they fucking suck. They don't even use real midranges, tweeters, OR subwoofers. The satellite speakers use horrible tang band drivers, they combine the mid and tweeters - ugh. Their so-called "subwoofers" use 5.5" drivers, that is simply beyond pathetic. Real subwoofers for home theater do not start until they reach about 10-12 inches. Period. You can not obtain sub sonic bass with a 5.5" sub driver.

You could easily find a $500 home theater in a box that would kill ANY Bose system. Do not be fooled by their slick marketing.

Blake, dude.. I never chose Bose, I just listed options.. Sony was there too! Read before speaking next time.

brian:

I have an idea of starting a movie theater does anyone know of a good site i can learn more about this industry?

please email me
tbhou@sbcglobal.net

Post a comment


About

fatPaulie is about enjoyment of life, plain and simple. If it's something that makes life a little better, or if it's some advice about how to take that bad and make it good, or even if it's some rant that needed to be ranted to cleanse the soul, then it'll be here on fatPaulie.

fatPaulie is currently brought to you by six intrepid bloggers - Sarah B, Rachel, Christopher Robin, Cory, Dan and Paulie. We're seeking new talent from around the world, so drop us a line if you'd like a place to post.

Contact

paulie@fatpaulie.com
(306) 261-5236 (after 7pm)